Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.
As a guideline, answers to questions should be a minimum of 175 words in length; posts in response to peers should be about 100-150 words in length. All posts should include value-added perspectives (personal and workplace examples are great!) and integrate concepts from course readings and additional research.
Please be reminded that your sources should be cited. This is good writing protocol, as well as helping us identify sources for our learning.
When a prospective client has previously been audited, the successor auditor makes certain inquiries of the predecessor auditor before accepting the engagement. The successor auditor should request permission of the prospective client before contacting the predecessor auditor.
Discuss the type of information the auditor should include in the request to the former auditor.
Explain whether the auditor should proceed with conducting a the audit if information received from the former auditor has significant negative information about circumstances that would require special attention.
Explain what steps the auditor should proceed if the decision has been made to cancel the audit.
Reply to at least 2 of your classmates. Be constructive and professional in your responses.
Copyright 2019 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2018 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved.